LEGAL JAM bassist Richard Gaya told Louder that that they never objected to a name change at the request of PEARL JAM, but that they were surprised by the heavy-handed manner in which the Eddie Vedder-fronted outfit demanded the U.K. group’s compliance.

“PEARL JAM has known about us for years,” Gaya said. “They’ve been in touch with us specifically about the 2018 Borderline gig and never before voiced any concerns, but they wait for a global pandemic to get in touch with us, and they do so through aggressive solicitor letters, rather than reaching out to us personally.

“They have recently changed their manager. We don’t know if that’s relevant, but we have been told on several occasions — we have it in writing — that the band members are aware and have approved this action.

“PEARL JAM battled against Ticketmaster, they battled against Trump, if you look at the lyrics of their songs, they’re anti-suicide, they’ve spoken about domestic violence, they’ve spoken about police brutality, all these social issues and now suddenly it’s all — oh by the way, here’s a legal letter. It’s so out of keeping with PEARL JAM, and I think that’s where the outrage comes from.”

Because tribute band names are often a play on the original artist’s name, which are valuable federally registered trademarks, using similar names and trading off the name, brand, images and reputation of the original act could be considered trademark infringement.

In 2010, lawyers for Universal Music in Sweden reportedly sent out legal notices to more than fifteen ABBA tribute acts demanding that they stop trading off the name “ABBA“. A year earlier, the all-female BON JOVI tribute act BLONDE JOVI was contacted by BON JOVI‘s lawyer who insisted that the tribute act was diminishing the value of his client’s brand and creating a “likelihood of confusion” between the two acts, and therefore demanded that they stop using the name immediately.

Source: Blabbermouth